Gay Couples’ Right to Adopt in the 21st
Century
Nowadays, homosexuality and also these people’s rights
are a debuted issue. Most frequently, it is questioning in this topic whether
law should allow parents from the same gender to adopt and raise a child as it
is considered to be unnatural and usually problematic if one examines the
psychological development of a child.
Moreover, homosexuality is one of the most disputed phenomenon with its
divisive power among a society so gay couples’ rights have been in a continuous
change that people have to realize and accept. I believe that adoption for gay
couples should be allowed and ensured by law as people have the basic human
right to be treated equally.
On the other hand, the discrimination that appears in
this case raises the question whether people can talk about equality which is
officially determined as:”The state of being equal, especially
in status, rights, or opportunities”. Evidently, homosexuality is not the part of this ‘category’ due
to the lack of rights to get married or the lack of opportunity to live without
any kind of segregation. In many countries gay people are not supported or
protected by any laws and without it everybody has the right to treat them
according to their best beliefs. However, there have been several measures to
extend and support federal legal protections for homosexual couples in certain
countries and in the USA since the 21st century. As the act, which defined
marriage as a union between man and woman, was repealed in 2013, the government
of the USA started to recognize same-sex marriage and other marriage programs
and laws (Barnes no pag.). Moreover, same-sex marriage became legal in 19
states and with the Employment Nondiscrimination Act homosexuals are also
protected from any kind of discriminative treatment in their workplace, which
means that equal opportunities have started to develop (O’Keefe no pag).
At the same time, homosexuality is also the target of
some rancorous people. It is our society that mainly generates the hatred and
doubts against gay people, therefore through a legal process should be ensured
their rights that they are equally entitled to have. Similarly, adoption is a
process through one can have a child and also have the opportunity to raise
one. As it is supervised by law there is no need to discriminate any couple
just on the basis of sexual orientation. They should be treated as equal to the other
applicants and in the same way the general and financial background of gay
couples should be supervised not their sexual orientation.
In conclusion, I believe that nowadays the term:
“separate but equal” has also the significance and meaning and it is relevant
in the case of homosexuality. In 1896 Homer Plessy was arrested for traveling
in a train reserved for only white people in New Orleans, Louisiana. Being a
man of mixed race, he was treated separately along with blacks but he stood up
for their civil rights (Duignan no pag.). Even if Plessy was convicted and
sentenced to pay fine, the question of the interpretation of equality not just
remained unsolved but raised further controversies. The court’s term: “separate
but equal” became the motto of the issue and it has appeared many times since
1896. These two expressions will go hand
in hand as long as people learn not to judge others on the bases of their
diversity or a law is ordered against political or any kind of other
discriminations. Homosexual people have to fight for their rights and end up
with the almost ancient second part of the term. As human beings they have the
right to be treated equally and to make their own decisions about starting a
family. Adoption should be a chance for a child for a better life not a new torture
for a homosexual for gaining their basic rights.
Works Cited
Foner,
Eric and Garraty, A. John. The Reader’s
Companion to American History. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing
Company, 1991
Reilly,
Mollie.” Same-Sex Couples can Now Adopt
Children In All 50 States”
huffingtonpost, www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/mississippi-same-sex-adoption_us_56fdb1a3e4b083f5c607567f
huffingtonpost, www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/mississippi-same-sex-adoption_us_56fdb1a3e4b083f5c607567f
Barnes,
Robert. “Supreme Court strikes down key part of Defense of Marriage Act”
Washington Post, www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court/2013/06/26/f0039814-d9ab-11e2-a016-92547bf094cc_story.html
Washington Post, www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court/2013/06/26/f0039814-d9ab-11e2-a016-92547bf094cc_story.html
O’Keefe, Ed. “The
Fix - ENDA, explained”
Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/11/04/what-is-the-employment-non-discrimination-act-enda/?utm_term=.c7856a0ff976
Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2013/11/04/what-is-the-employment-non-discrimination-act-enda/?utm_term=.c7856a0ff976
No comments:
Post a Comment